uid=FCE,o=lter,dc=ecoinformatics,dc=org read public read SFWSC_002 Common snook (Centropomus undecimalis) movements from the South Florida Water, Sustainability and Climate Project Study Area, within the Shark River estuary, South Florida from February 2012 to May 2014 Dr. Jennifer Rehage South Florida Water, Sustainability, and Climate Project Principle investigator Florida International University University Park ECS 119 Miami, FL 33199 USA 305-348-0181 305-348-6137 rehagej@fiu.edu http://www2.fiu.edu/~rehagej/ Florida Coastal Everglades LTER Program Florida International University University Park OE 148 Miami, FL 33199 USA 305-348-6054 fcelter@fiu.edu http://fcelter.fiu.edu Jennifer Rehage South Florida Water, Sustainability, and Climate Project Florida International University University Park ECS 119 Miami, FL 33199 USA 305-348-0181 rehagej@fiu.edu http://www2.fiu.edu/~rehagej/ Principle investigator Ross Boucek South Florida Water, Sustainability, and Climate Project Florida International University University Park ECS 119 Miami, FL 33199 USA 305-348-0181 rbouc003@fiu.edu Graduate student research 2020-10-01 Movements of common snook (Centropomus undecimalis) in the Shark River estuary were measured using passive acoustic telemetry. Snook were fitted with a V-16 acoustic transmitters, transmitters emit an ultrasonic pulse at random every 60 – 180 seconds that can be interpreted by autonomous listening stations dispersed throughout the Shark River estuary. Once a listening station detects a transmitter, it records a time of detection and a unique tag ID. SFWSC South Florida Water, Sustainability, and Climate Project ecological research water sustainability climate South Florida hydro-economic models management schemes impact economic value ecosystem services climate variability climate change sea level rise adaptive water management economic productivity These data are classified as 'Type II' whereby original SFWSC experimental data collected by individual SFWSC researchers are to be released to restricted audiences according to terms specified by the owners of the data. Type II data are considered to be exceptional and should be rare in occurrence. The justification for exceptions must be well documented and approved by the lead PI and Site Data Manager. Some examples of Type II data restrictions may include: locations of rare or endangered species, data that are covered under prior licensing or copyright (e.g., SPOT satellite data), or covered by the Human Subjects Act, Student Dissertation data and those data related to the SFWSC project but not funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) WSC program (EAR-1204762) and the NIFA Award Number 2012-67003-19862. Researchers that make use of Type II Data may be subject to additional restrictions to protect any applicable commercial or confidentiality interests. For a complete description of the SFWSC Data Distribution and Data User Agreement, please go to SFWSC Data Management Policy: http://eimc.fiu.edu/projects/SFWSC/SFWSC_DataManagementPolicy.pdf. Additionally, two copies of the manuscript must be submitted to the South Florida Water, Sustainability and Climate Project, c/o Dr. Mike Sukop, Department of Earth & Environment, Florida International University, ECS 347, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, Florida 33199. South Florida Water, Sustainability, and Climate Project Study Area -81.078 -81.078 25.365 25.365 2012-02-02 2014-05-03 Database is updated every 4 months, and is ongoing Ross Boucek South Florida Water, Sustainability, and Climate Project Ross Boucek Florida International University University Park ECS 119 Miami, FL 33199 USA 305-348-0181 rbouc003@fiu.edu South Florida Water, Sustainability, and Climate Project Dr. Mike Sukop Florida International University University Park ECS 347 11200 SW 8th Street Miami, FL 33199 USA 305-348-3117 305-348-3877 sukopm@fiu.edu http://sfwsc.fiu.edu/index.html Florida Coastal Everglades LTER Program Florida International University University Park OE 148 Miami, FL 33199 USA 305-348-6054 fcelter@fiu.edu http://fcelter.fiu.edu Fish were fitted with a V-16 acoustic transmitters. Transmitters were implanted surgically into the body cavity of fishes following IACUC Protocol #200135. Transmitters emit an ultrasonic pulse at random every 60 – 180 seconds that can be interpreted by autonomous listening stations dispersed throughout the Shark River estuary. Once a listening station detects a transmitter, it records a time of detection and a unique tag ID. Data were downloaded off of receivers every two months Multi-tissue stable isotope analysis and acoustic telemetry reveal seasonal variability in the trophic interactions of juvenile bull sharks in a coastal estuary Philip Matich 2014-01-01 Journal of Animal Ecology 83 1 199-213 Tagging fish Dr. Philip Matich Florida International University Graduate Student 3000 NE 151st North Miami, Florida 33181 USA pmati001@fiu.edu 2014-01-01 Passive acoustic tracking was used to quantify the movement patterns of individual snook. to assess their use of upstream areas of the estuary in response to the marsh prey pulse. Snook were surgically fitted with a Vemco V16 transmitter (Vemco, Halifax, NS, Canada). Transmitters were set to emit a unique series of pulses for each shark at a random interval between 60 and 180 s (mean emission interval = 120 s). Movements of acoustically tagged sharks were tracked within an array of 43 Vemco VR2 and VR2W acoustic receivers. In situ measurements revealed mean detection ranges of receivers were c. 500 m. Each receiver was attached to a PVC pipe set in a 10-kg cement anchor. Data from receivers were downloaded every 3–4 months for the duration of the study, and batteries were replaced as needed. Passive acoustic tracking was used to quantify the movement patterns of individual snook. to assess their use of upstream areas of the estuary in response to the marsh prey pulse. Snook were surgically fitted with a Vemco V16 transmitter (Vemco, Halifax, NS, Canada). Transmitters were set to emit a unique series of pulses for each shark at a random interval between 60 and 180 s (mean emission interval = 120 s). Movements of acoustically tagged sharks were tracked within an array of 43 Vemco VR2 and VR2W acoustic receivers. In situ measurements revealed mean detection ranges of receivers were c. 500 m. Each receiver was attached to a PVC pipe set in a 10-kg cement anchor. Data from receivers were downloaded every 3–4 months for the duration of the study, and batteries were replaced as needed. Passive acoustic tracking was used to quantify the movement patterns of individual snook. to assess their use of upstream areas of the estuary in response to the marsh prey pulse. Snook were surgically fitted with a Vemco V16 transmitter (Vemco, Halifax, NS, Canada). Transmitters were set to emit a unique series of pulses for each shark at a random interval between 60 and 180 s (mean emission interval = 120 s). Movements of acoustically tagged sharks were tracked within an array of 43 Vemco VR2 and VR2W acoustic receivers. In situ measurements revealed mean detection ranges of receivers were c. 500 m. Each receiver was attached to a PVC pipe set in a 10-kg cement anchor. Data from receivers were downloaded every 3–4 months for the duration of the study, and batteries were replaced as needed. Passive acoustic tracking was used to quantify the movement patterns of individual snook. to assess their use of upstream areas of the estuary in response to the marsh prey pulse. Snook were surgically fitted with a Vemco V16 transmitter (Vemco, Halifax, NS, Canada). Transmitters were set to emit a unique series of pulses for each shark at a random interval between 60 and 180 s (mean emission interval = 120 s). Movements of acoustically tagged sharks were tracked within an array of 43 Vemco VR2 and VR2W acoustic receivers. In situ measurements revealed mean detection ranges of receivers were c. 500 m. Each receiver was attached to a PVC pipe set in a 10-kg cement anchor. Data from receivers were downloaded every 3–4 months for the duration of the study, and batteries were replaced as needed. Passive acoustic tracking was used to quantify the movement patterns of individual snook. to assess their use of upstream areas of the estuary in response to the marsh prey pulse. Snook were surgically fitted with a Vemco V16 transmitter (Vemco, Halifax, NS, Canada). Transmitters were set to emit a unique series of pulses for each shark at a random interval between 60 and 180 s (mean emission interval = 120 s). Movements of acoustically tagged sharks were tracked within an array of 43 Vemco VR2 and VR2W acoustic receivers. In situ measurements revealed mean detection ranges of receivers were c. 500 m. Each receiver was attached to a PVC pipe set in a 10-kg cement anchor. Data from receivers were downloaded every 3–4 months for the duration of the study, and batteries were replaced as needed. Acoustic tracking Snook VEMCO Immobilize fish with anesthetic create a 20 mm incision on ventral side of body cavity insert tag into body cavity close wound with 2 stiches waterproof wound with super glue V 16 transmitters are 16 x 68 mm in a cylinder shape, addtional information can be found http://vemco.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/v16-coded.pdf VR2W Listening devices are cylindrical 308 mm long x 73 mm diameter and are anchored to the benthos additional information can be found http://vemco.com/products/vr2w-180khz/?product-specifications Fish were collected via electrofishing methods, No free lunch: displaced marsh consumers regulate a prey subsidy to an estuarine consumer. Ross Boucek 2013-10-01 Oikos 122 10 1453-1464 Catching fish Ross Boucek Florida International University Graduate Researcher Florida International University University Park ECS 119 Miami, FL 33199 USA 305-348-0181 2013-10-01 We captured snook using a boat-mounted, generator-powered electrofisher (two-anode, one cathode Smith-Root 9.0 unit) . Boat electrofishing is an effective sampling technique in freshwater habitats, including the Everglades, and has been used successfully to sample upper estuarine fish communities (Rehage and Loftus 2007). We conducted three replicate electrofishing bouts (timed sampling transects) at fixed locations in each site, each 200 m apart. For each bout, we ran the boat at idle speed at a randomly-selected creek shoreline and applied power for 5 min of time, during which two netters captured all immobilized fishes. We standardize power output to 1500 Watts, given temperature and conductance conditions measured at the beginning of each bout. We captured snook using a boat-mounted, generator-powered electrofisher (two-anode, one cathode Smith-Root 9.0 unit) . Boat electrofishing is an effective sampling technique in freshwater habitats, including the Everglades, and has been used successfully to sample upper estuarine fish communities (Rehage and Loftus 2007). We conducted three replicate electrofishing bouts (timed sampling transects) at fixed locations in each site, each 200 m apart. For each bout, we ran the boat at idle speed at a randomly-selected creek shoreline and applied power for 5 min of time, during which two netters captured all immobilized fishes. We standardize power output to 1500 Watts, given temperature and conductance conditions measured at the beginning of each bout. We captured snook using a boat-mounted, generator-powered electrofisher (two-anode, one cathode Smith-Root 9.0 unit) . Boat electrofishing is an effective sampling technique in freshwater habitats, including the Everglades, and has been used successfully to sample upper estuarine fish communities (Rehage and Loftus 2007). We conducted three replicate electrofishing bouts (timed sampling transects) at fixed locations in each site, each 200 m apart. For each bout, we ran the boat at idle speed at a randomly-selected creek shoreline and applied power for 5 min of time, during which two netters captured all immobilized fishes. We standardize power output to 1500 Watts, given temperature and conductance conditions measured at the beginning of each bout. Electrofishing fish capture Apply electric current to sampling area net immobilized fish place fish into a water tank on boat 21 foot Aluminum boat fitted with a generator and other electrofishing equipment (see citation 28) Data Checking protocols Spatiotemporal dynamics of spawning aggregations of common snook on the east coast of Florida. Joy Young Marine Ecology Progress Series 505 227-240 Checking data Joy Young Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Tequesta Field Laboratory, Junior Scientist 19100 Southeast Federal Highway Tequesta , Florida 33469 USA joy.young@myfwc.com 2014-05-01 Telemetry data normally contain a certain amount of erroneous detections which can increase in number due to code collisions from the detection of other tags, and abiotic (e.g. boat) and biotic (e.g. snapping shrimp) noise. Prior to analyses, ‘false’ detections and were removed from the dataset. False detections Data checking identify distance and time between fish detections determine if that distance is feasible for fish to travel in the duration between detections If impossible, false detection is deleted None Shark River Estuary, SFWSC Study Area Passive acoustic tracking was used to quantify the movement patterns of individual snook. to assess their use of upstream areas of the estuary in response to the marsh prey pulse. Snook were surgically fitted with a Vemco V16 transmitter (Vemco, Halifax, NS, Canada). Transmitters were set to emit a unique series of pulses for each shark at a random interval between 60 and 180 s (mean emission interval = 120 s). Movements of acoustically tagged sharks were tracked within an array of 43 Vemco VR2 and VR2W acoustic receivers. In situ measurements revealed mean detection ranges of receivers were c. 500 m. Each receiver was attached to a PVC pipe set in a 10-kg cement anchor. Data from receivers were downloaded every 3–4 months for the duration of the study, and batteries were replaced as needed. Shark River Estuary, Everglades National Park, FL US. -81.078 -81.078 25.365 25.365 Shark River Estuary, Everglades National Park, FL US. -81.078 -80.490 25.761 24.913 Detection data are managed and checked through software provided by VEMCO. See http://vemco.com/products/vue-software/?product-software South Florida Water, Sustainability, and Climate Project Mike Sukop South Florida Water, Sustainability, and Climate Project Department of Earth & Environment, ECS 347, University Park, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199 USA 305-348-3117 305-348-3877 sukopm@fiu.edu Lead Principal Investigator The project’s objectives are to: 1) Develop a hydro-economic model for South Florida that optimizes water allocations based on the economic value of water; 2) Develop new information on the economic value of ecosystem services to be incorporated into model formulations; 3) Test management schemes designed to increase the resilience of water resources to climate variability, climate change, and SLR; 4) Engage stakeholders to improve understanding of the cognitive and perceptual biases in risk management and decision-making; and 5) Develop recommendations for adaptive water management that optimize economic and ecological productivity and foster sustained public support. National Science Foundation (NSF) WSC program (EAR-1204762) and the NIFA Award Number 2012-67003-19862. The SFWSC Study area is located in South Florida. -82.28 -80.03 28.56 24.52 2014-08-26 2017-12-31 SFWSC_002 Common snook (Centropomus undecimalis) movements from the South Florida Water, Sustainability and Climate Project Study Area, within the Shark River estuary, South Florida SFWSC_002 3.80 ASCII 1 \r\n column , Transmitter_ID Individual snook fitted with a transmitter The tag identification code of individual tags The tag identification code of individual tags Date date Collection date datetime YYYY-MM-DD 1 2012-02-12 2014-05-03 Time Tagging Time Tagging Time datetime hh:mm:ss 00:00:08 23:56:18 Latitude latitude in decimal degrees of a single detection coordinate coordinate coordinate Longitude Longitude in decimal degrees of a single detection coordinate coordinate coordinate 68012 Long-term Type I 2014-09-29 FCE I aim to determine the relative importance of interannual variations in the hydrologic regime on tropical fish I) reproduction II) juvenile recruitment, and ultimately III) angler catch rates. I aim to conduct a six year field study tracking reproductive and recruitment dynamics of a popular tropical recreationally targeted species, snook. I will then relate these reproductive and recruitment dynamics to factors of the hydrologic regime that may vary across years. Identifying mechanisms that contribute to the sustainability of South Florida fisheries are of the outmost importance. Given the strength of hydrology as a driver for tropical fishes, it is likely that deviations from tropical hydrologic regimes in South Florida are at least playing some role in driving the population performance of tropical fishes. Further, with the largest restoration effort ever attempted underway in the Everglades, it is critical to understand how exactly do freshwater inflows influence the system’s most valuable fisheries in order to predict how these fisheries may respond to this restoration effort and perhaps adjust management to benefit the fishery EVER-SCI-2013-0020 These SFWSC research data are being managed by the Florida Coastal Everglades LTER Program